Wednesday, May 17, 2006

10 miles out in VF at 7:25s. My legs feel very heavy; this makes no sense. Tomorrow, this. It's fast and flat. It should be a good one if I can get the feeling back. I'd be happy with anything under 16:19. I had the luck of tucking my daughter in tonight. She's aware of this race and her line of questioning before the race, and before all races that I run, is always some strange flowchart of award possibilities--from money down to gimcrack. Sometimes when she's asking me these questions, my one-word answers are similar to T.E. Lawrence's in that wonderful movie. The shortness of them speaks volumes to her. Josie: Race tomorrow DD? Me: Yes. Josie: 5k? Me: Yes. Josie: Kenyans? Me: No, I doubt it. Josie: Money? Me: No. Josie: Trophies? Me: Yes. Josie: What kind of trophies? How big? Me: I don't know what the gimcrack will be. Josie: What's gimcrack, DD? Me: Garbage. Josie: I thought you said there'd be trophies, not garbage? Me: Yes. Josie: I don't get it DD! Me: That's ok. Goodnight dear, I love you. Josie: Goodnight, DD. I love you too! --------------------------- Hot damn I love garlic. I take pieces when I cook steak and slide them into the meat. I then take dry rub and smother the steak. Apologies to any of you vegetarians for that remark. Right now I'm actually chewing on a piece of garlic. I let a sliver of it sit in my mouth and I just take it all in. Hot damn again; I love garlic. When I ran the Reach the Beach Relay last year, I felt like doo on the beginning of my last leg. I started to catch the runner from the Bucknell masters team. He had a good lead on me to start with (minutes). During the last few minutes something weird happened: I shed all my fatigue: I came up on my toes and ran fast. I don't know how fast it was, but I'd wager my final mile was about 5:00. The only reason I bring this up is that this mental 'barbarian kick' resides in all of us. The more I race 5ks, the more I realize that I have it somewhere and that what separates me from a real 15:4X 5k is going down there and finding it again. Training won't make it happen, something else will and I need to think more about where to look for it. Maybe just acknowledging its existence is the first place to start? I don't want to waste this horridly written essay any more on this topic--especially since this feeling was first with me during the Northern CA. XC sectionals in 1990 where I placed 8th overall after coming from like 50th place. It springs up from time to time. It was there last year when I ran a probably-short 15:47 5k after making the wrong turn at the start. I think it's the same feeling that Mills at the end of his race as well as Viren after he got back up off the ground in that magic Olympic 10,000-meter final. We all have it somewhere. -------------------------------------- This one's worth a gander. --------------------------------------- The following comment was left sometime this morning by Tony Jasica. Had he not made the false statement that I hate him, I'd have left the comments to stand for themselves. Silence is good sometimes, but not now--especially when the word 'hate' is carpet-bombed across this site: "I am curious as to why you hate me so much...You seem to take delight in humiliating me in your blogs, yet you offer no real reason why, except to expose the fact you are such are are a superior runner than myself. Wow, Mr. Larkin, I bowdown before your ability to make fun of the "Fat Runners" in America, because God knows we are not an easy target... " Dear Tony, You expect readers to come across this comment and jump into your corner; you look for sympathy and cast the same tired stereotypes of the 'elite' fast and skinny guy making fun of the poor ole' slow guy; you may even hope that people will associate you as the underdog, David, taking on Goliath, the big loudmouth, sub-elite wannabe: me. We've already got a few Davids lurking about on this site with slingshots--just so you know. But not so fast. Had you gone a few layers past your own Google search for your name which brought you here, had you ventured past the month of May on my blog, had you perhaps even googled someone else besides yourself, you might have responded differently. You might even have connected the dots on why I seem to go after you from time to time. I suppose it's these words that do it for me. Your words, from this article: "Dear Sir...Perhaps you should have read the feature article about my story in the 1/7 Tampa Tribune before making fun of my supposedly hilarious marathon effort. Apparently the people at Balance Bars found my story compelling enough to award me one of 11 nationwide grants from over 1200 applicants. So, until you know the facts, please keep your pedantic writing to yourself. And to Jennifer...until you've had to overcome any personal adversity, physical problems, and societal prejudice that overweight people face on a daily basis --don't you dare call ANYONE who finishes a marathon a "lemming"." The quote first smells of entitlement; it drifts around for a couple sentences and then it disappears, replaced by a more pungent, sickening odor: self-pity. And now a repeat of a very important sentence. Had you learned about the person you say 'hates' you, had you really tried to learn about my own walk in life and my own struggles with the genetic endomorphic monster (a sprightly 230lbs in 2001 babee), had you read about me and my marathon history or people on this very site who I associate with and their waistlines or marathon paces, instead of looking for more about yourself, you'd perhaps understand that I'm not as simple as a skinny, 'fast' guy at the other end of the ring out to go make fun of 'fat runners.' I'm like everyone else--I'm one hell of a complex guy, and I like to think there's some rhyme to my reason. I was closer to you than you realize. Do some homework; read a bit; slow down; take a breath. Be a meticulous investigative reporter instead of a spontaneous, misinformed mudslinger. I don't hate you; I'd love to see you run faster and to reach higher than the first goal of marathon completion. I'd love to read the fact that some day you qualify for Boston--without a grant from a candy bar company that poses as a nutrition bar company. I'd love to witness all this taking place buried below the headlines where the folks that truly deserve a brighter spotlight belong. I suppose it comes down to the spotlight. You never once agreed with the point that while your feat was admirable, it happens every day, along quiet roads to thousands of people. Thousands of people wake up, look at themselves in the mirror, and commit themselves to the lofty challenge of weight loss. They run their first marathon without a fancy story or a nifty press release or a sponsorship. They don't beat their chests about it and then defend it over and over again in endless vanitygoogle searches across multiple blogs. They do it in silence. Some of them even realize that it can go further. They don't settle for a now relatively low standard and rest on their 'I did it!" laurels for a lifetime of memories of that glorious 5:58 slog. They aspire to run faster, to push their bodies to new places--they dream to win. Winning, now that's a headline! ------------------------------ Injustice. I'm always quick to find them in the slightest degree with regards to my pathetic self, so here's one major fucking injustice: Deena Kastor runs a 2:19 to win the London Marathon and she sits in a running store in NYC by herself less than one month later. Where do I begin? Webb breaks Steve Scott's record.... Ritz kicks Meb's 10k to the curb....then Webb beats Ritz and then Ritznwebb beats Webbnritz Goucher makes a comeback and just runs really fast behind Bekele and a million imported, African, Qatarian runners coached by Mr. Canova who's tailed by Mr. Hudson who's taking notes behind the pillar--disguised in a brown trenchcoat, a Lands' End seersucker suit, and a deerstalker cap---posing as a reporter for Runner's World who's real assignment is to find the stolen running stones. This particular scene plays out like a Peter Sellers movie, even down to the David Niven jewel thief character who's hidden the stolen stones in Goucher's Nike Rival(TM) XC spikes. Rupp, looking the part from the PG-13 movie, and under the gentle, fatherly eyes of Salazar, falls down on the new Nike(TM) track after a hard run...he throws his hands up to the sky as the flashbulbs pop and the cheesy music starts to kick in.... Meb kicks Khalid to the curb....USA! USA! USA! um..Eritrea n USA!...Eritrea n USA!....Eritrea n USA!....NO!!! damnit....USA! USA! USA! you commie bastards.... All men, all wouldn't sit by themselves in a store a month later....think about it. Just do it. Swoosh. Bling-Bling.

18 Comments:

WalkSports.com said...

As someone who has lost 50-55 pounds and has kept it off, but who also has dropped half and full marathon times by 40 and 52 minutes, respectively, the guilty party here is whoever wrote the newspaper article.

They're "often" the ones that have no clue. We have the top Masters runner in the country in Houston, Sean Wade, and he gets NO coverage in the Chronicle.

The human interest stories are nice. They're inspiring. I was once one of them (Nov. 2004 Chronicle), but the writer stumbled upon me when I was trying to give her statistical information on local runners that nobody outside of the running community knew how talented they really were.

I put my weight loss number on my web site not to champion my cause, but so that if it inspires somebody, great. If not, who cares?

If I sought the attention, I would want it for running well relative to my ability and training. If I didn't train well and posted a poor time, I shouldn't be whining about it. I should be out there working harder.

He sure doesn't want to read http://justrundammit.blogspot.com/.

5/17/2006 12:43:28 PM  
Elizabeth said...

oh my that video was priceless! Thanks for the smile!

5/17/2006 12:56:18 PM  
Eric said...

You have this guy dead to rights, Duncan. Tactical use of the pen, er, keyboard well directed.

It's sad and unfortunate that Mr. Jasica continues to (try) to be the de facto spokesperson for everyone in a similar situation who does what they do, with humility and without fanfare, every day.

5/17/2006 01:44:19 PM  
Marc said...

Nothing really to add to Eric's response. Exceptionally well-penned response.

5/17/2006 02:51:57 PM  
grammar police said...

A member of the Grammar Police has arrived. Has there been a violation?

Let's look at just one of Jasica's sentences:

His (incorrect): "...except to expose the fact you are such are are a superior runner than myself."

Correct, with verb: "...except to expose the fact that you are such a superior runner than I am."

Correct, without verb: "...a superior runner than I."

The nominative pronoun case ("I") must be used, even when the verb is dropped. The possessive case ("myself") is incorrect either way.

If you're going to go after folks by writing to them, Jasica, it is in your best interests to write correctly. It's very difficult for many folks to take a person seriously when in just one sentence he makes three distinct grammar errors (1. Extra, unnecessary "are are"; 2. Omission of restrictor "that"; 3. Improper pronoun case).

For contrast, we should note Duncan's next paragraph, in which he mixes independent clauses, subordinate clauses, and the objective pronoun case with a scintillating variety of punctuation. He demonstrates skill and care with his prose, winning over his audience right from the start.

Here's your ticket back to oblivion, Jasica. And here's the worst part of this violation: it has nothing to do with your running--nothing at all.

5/17/2006 04:55:56 PM  
Mike said...

Good luck at the 5K, and I love the paragraph about the "barbarian kick". I'll remember that as I round mile 2 this weekend.

5/17/2006 07:52:55 PM  
Dallen said...

I love the "barbarian kick" statement. I think many of us could likely drop 10-20 seconds off of our PRs if we had the guts to find that long hard kick.

5/17/2006 08:18:07 PM  
William's Drunk, Jr. said...

To grammar police:

"Such a superior runner than I am" and "superior runner than I" are both nonsense constructs. Tony's sentence is best recast like this:

"...except to expose the fact you are superior to me as a runner."

Or even more simply:

"...except to expose your superiority as a runner."

Had you used the comparative "better" instead of the superlative "superior," you could have used "than." But in neither case is the inclusion of the word "such" correct as you've employed it. So your correction is wrong in two distinct aspects.

Also, "myself" is a reflexive pronoun, not a possessive pronoun; perhaps you were thinking of "mine."

Regrettably, given your transgressions here I'm going to have to ask you to turn in your badge. You're on administrative leave until you provide evidence of eithr passing the TOEFL or being published in the letters section of "Runner's World." Thanks.

5/17/2006 09:16:41 PM  
William's Drunk, Jr. said...

Oops! I meant "either," of course.

5/17/2006 09:19:40 PM  
Grammar Police Lieutenant said...

Nice try, Turabian, but the role of the grammar police is not to recast. We leave that to Lanham.

Technically "superior" is not a superlative. Tony wanted to use it as a comparative, so we dropped that charge in light of moving on to more egregious crimes.

The way Tony has used "myself" is as a possessive, which again is incorrect. When properly used it is a reflexive, but it must coordinate with a reflexive verb, conspicuously absent in Tony's sentence.

Now let's move on to the errors of your ways. You have placed the title of a magazine in quotes, which is outrageously defiant; it should be in italics or underlined. You have used a fuzzy semicolon before a prepositional subordinate clause, which is cause for head-shaking, finger-wagging behavior. And you have dared to confront the grammar police with revision work, which is absolutely not in our contract.

We officially wave our union cards at you, you so-called Arthur King, you and all your slimy English knights!

5/17/2006 09:35:11 PM  
Eric said...

Ooo! An English fight! I have to take issue with the "omission of restrictor 'that'" specified in the initial comment. The argument may be technically correct, but the convention is used often, and as such the omission has become commonplace.

It's efficient. So their.

5/18/2006 06:29:24 AM  
Elizabeth said...

The gimcrack line is great. It is so funny at all the local races all the running club peeps try to give away their trophies. I mean really what are you going to do with those things?

I don't even have a place for mine but feel guilty just tossing them so you can find them all over. The heavier ones make nice paper weights :)

5/18/2006 07:48:47 AM  
Tony Jasica said...

Feel better now, Mr. Larkin? You finally got to write the blog you've been waiting four long months to write about me. All I asked in my response is WHY you continue to equate something slow and arduous with my name (i.e., your daughter's bowling, your desk-building skills, etc.), and instead of a reply I see you hop back up in your pulpit and begin another smear campaign. I never asked the Tampa Tribune to write an article about what I did. Kevin Beck wrote about it and while I misinterpreted his response to the article,I at least made my peace with Kevin and moved on with my life. But YOU couldn't let go, instead continuing to badger and cajole me to battle you, using my name as bait on Google (and please don't lecture me on the vanity of searching one's own name on the internet...because I'm sure you've NEVER done that to yourself, right?). You chastise me for not "investigating" your story to discover the truth about you. Well, it's simply because you are not worth investigating. I don't know you, I don't want to know you...you were the one to pick me apart. I have never called you out personally, I have better things to do with my life. You accuse me of "chest-thumping" for "Fat America". Where have you seen that except for my initial response to Kevin Beck's article? You are the one with the "blog", who has to write about your accomplishments (and occasionally belittle complete strangers). I gave up this fight months ago, although seeing your affinity for using my name as a description of all things slow (it was the same bad knee from the '92 L.A. Marathon that caused my slow time, by the way...) --I may begin describing all things vile and worthless as "DuncanLarkin-esque". Sound fair? And for the "Grammar Police"...thank you for my invitation to "Oblivion". If the lot in your sorry life is to dissect every sentence written in blogs, then you must be the St. Peter of Oblivion. Cheers!

5/18/2006 10:40:56 AM  
Meghan said...

First, from the Grammar Police, now the Peace Police:

In the grand scheme of things, all of us runners are the minority in our increasingly sedentary and unnable-to-exercise society, in whatever capacity we do run. I take refuge in places like this blog and with people who mill around here because the "rest of the world" isn't too runner-friendly. There are people who aim for puddles as they drive so as to splash you muddy while you run. There are the perpetual cat-calls, whistles, and other vociferous notables from the "rest of the world" as we trot by. There are those that call us obsessive, eating disordered, compulsive, and manic because we have a healthy hobby and they don't. Now really, I have little desire to be "out there" with all that. I'd rather be in here, where we runners can compare notes without judgement.

Okay, that was a pile of crap, wasn't it? Do I actually think that humans could manage to get along for even 7 seconds? Not so much. This war is fun to watch, battle on compadres.

However, the funner read (grammatical incorrectness intended to make said Grammar Police smile) is that of a runner's perpetual work towards better running and/or a better life.

5/18/2006 11:22:29 AM  
sickofTonyJasica(tm) said...

I'm finding it hard to wrap my head around your logic, Tony. YOU are spending a significant amount of time posting a long-winded, whiny retort on somebody else's BLOG, continuing to poke at the hornet's nest, all the while saying you want nothing more than for Duncan to quit antagonizing YOU?!

Okay, you have a problem with one hornet. This blog is a hornet's nest. You are a fat guy with a stick. You come in here, try to take a few whacks (whiff), and get bit by every hornet in the place.

Now you're complaining about it? If you're so over this whole thing, grow a pair and ignore this blog. Stop doing google searches for your own name looking for someone to defend yourself against! Would Duncan googling for his own name make you feel better, clod? Unfortunately for you, Tony Jasica (tm) is now associated with the word 'undeserving' because of your demonstrated inability to control your unbelieveable pride. Just shut up, dude. Allow people to forget what an obnoxious lemming you are, and maybe soon they will. I had.

5/18/2006 01:40:16 PM  
Duncan Larkin said...

Tony, in this latest game of pejorative poker that we are playing, your three of a kind comprised of "vile","worthless", and "hate" clearly defeat my pair of smelly "entitlement" and "self pity." So I fold. You win. I hereby will no longer associate your given name on this space with anything remotely slow. I'll instead make up a fictitious character like Annie B.Graham or Jason Caity who I will use in your place when I describe underachievement, comfort with lax standards, or a marathon run at 13:39 per mile pace. Deal? Deal. Now go away from this blog for good and be rest assured that Google will never get your vanity lost in this dark corner of cyberspace again. Bye Bye.

5/18/2006 04:17:46 PM  
Mike said...

This whole tempest in a teacup mystifies me. I read your blog pretty much every day and I don't recall seeing this guy's name in it before. If there's a vendetta, it's either an almost completely silent one or I'm just not seeing it.

Bored now. Buh-bye now, He Who Shall Not Be Named.

5/18/2006 04:50:43 PM  
Tony Jasica said...

Thank You.

5/19/2006 01:33:08 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home