17 mile single run out here. Ran it in 1:55 (6:45 pace), but did the first 13 at 6:37 pace and then self-imploded in the last 4 in the languid, unshaded sections of the canal, where stagnant water and sunning turtles made me want to go hide underneath a tree; I am completely fried now. This part of the country and parts of this canal are pretty damn close to the African Congo in the Heart of Darkness. You got Nile-esque cataracts, prehistoric reptiles, mysterious water with strange bubbles, and dead things laying in the middle of dusty trails, frying, decomposing, smelling.
For some reason, I ate Chili for lunch and barfed it up in heartburn-induced spurts along the secret byways of this fine towpath.
-----------------------------------
Whoever is leaving anonymous, 9th grade scatalogical baboon comments on this blog, knock it the fuck off. Your anonymity is as certain as the time stamp correlated with my stats. I'm a few keystrokes from disabling all comments and a few more from shitcanning this whole blog because I don't have time to play the role of the shop teacher to you, the monkey with the real maturity problem in the back row. Take your bullshit to the bar, take it anywhere else, but here.
-----------------------------------
This incident of immature punks leaving letsrun.com b-board snippets out here was inevitable, and it's almost like I'm now pulling out a speech that was written about this very moment, in my head, a long time ago.
Ode to Growing Up.
Something has become unhinged these days--more so with men, than women. Sure, there's always been idiots and asses since the dawn of man. History is replete with them, and so it is a broad generalization to state that things were 'different' or 'better' in the old days. But when it comes to maturity vis-a-vis gentlemen there is compelling evidence nowadays that juvenile males are simply ceasing to mature into men.
A very trusted person in my life has recently told me and several others in front of a broader audience, while reading a prepared speech, that we've simply forgotten to become 'men.' Middle school sexual immaturity begets high school experimentation begets wanton collegiate savagery. All that is normal--nothing has changed since the dawn of man despite the revisionist 'Happy Days' mantra that your Gollygee Leave it to Beaver-1950s parents may try to shove down your throat. But a period is then supposed to happen in your life, a new sentence is supposed to begin, yes, a new paragraph should then take hold with a new idea: a new thesis--cleaner, fresher, calmer.
For the most part, once you leave college, it should be expected of you to conduct yourself in certain affairs in a certain manner. You are expected to demonstrate a moderate amount of civility and decency, and to at least hold yourself up to a relatively moderate standard; children should look up to you; your image in the mirror should be one of dignity and some semblance of chivalry. Not chivalry in the archaic, pre-feminist movement sense, but rather chivalry in the modern sense where your actions and calculated restraint now speak volumes and your mark on the planet is more constructive than selfish, more example setting than scatalogical, ad hominem high fives, wet tee shirts, WAAAAHOOOO! and Comedy Central sewage.
So this is directed at all the 'guys' out there: be a man.
Wednesday, May 10, 2006
About Me
Currently reading: Naked by David Sedaris
Previous Posts
- 20.8 mile single run in 2:34. I forgot to mention...
- Workout 1. 10 miles in 74 minutes. Workout 2. 7 m...
- 45th overall, Broad Street 10 Mile Run. 53:57(chip...
- 5 mile shakeout up and down the fractal route. 5 x...
- Workout 1. A bit over 8 miles in VF. 6:50s. Easy. ...
- Imitation is the best form of flattery. I'll admit...
- 16 miles out in VF. Easy pace. ------------------...
- 22 mile single run with a 6.5 mile progression at ...
- 11 miles. ---------------------- Double mountain ...
- Penn Relays. After the 9.75 mile run on Friday, I...
9 Comments:
Funny, I kind of want to barf now after reading this. I'm glad I don't have to do real workouts in the afternoon/evenings, there's too many opportunites for things to go wrong beforehand (like bad chili). I'm lucky enough to be able to do most of the hard stuff in the mornings before work. Nice run...except the last part of course. It's always good to practice vomiting while on the run so it's easier come marathon day (I'd put a smiley face here but it would surely be deleted).
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
Your style of writing, while highly entertaining, kind of invites bitchy comments from time to time. You know very well that quite a few things you write are controversial. And bitching about letsrun.com is probably a red rag to some of those guys.
Like Mike, I'd leave a smiley somewhere in here, but I'm afraid to become the next target of your rage.
Now I'm just intrigued as to what was in those posts! Just keep doing what you are doing and writing what you are writing Duncan, and ignore the idiots.
Cheers.
Thomas, the irony in your comment compels me to respond. The reason I deleted these simian comments was because they poked fun at fellow runners who posted comments--not me. So if it was 'rage' which I prefer to call instead 'sharpened writing,' it was rage in the defense of you guys.
How chivalrous of you. ;p
I agree with Thomas. I think it is ironic that you are deleting comments, when the very reason that most people find your blog and your writing so entertaining/amusing/infuriating is that your entries are often so inflammatory as to invite the jackass contingent. Further, you are denying us all the privilege of being entertained by the jackasses that try to compete with you by leaving snarky commments on your blog. And you are defending your actions by saying you're protecting us? Come on, Duncan. A few more censored comments, and I'm going to begin to wonder if your blog was bought out by Fox News.
Zing!
At the risk of being being labled a sycophant, what in the hell is so inflammatory about Duncan's postings? Thought provoking, entertaining, a challenge to running dogma - yes.
Inflammatory-where?
I think you're most at risk of sending someone to the dictionary. Are you serious? Duncan is a self-described ascerbic, which by association, if not definition, is inflammatory. Maybe not to you, because you're not on the pointy end of the stick. You can be assured, though, that the 'elected condo bluehairs', 'Cobra Kai Kevin's', 'Skirackers', 'Penguins', and other assorted characters don't see things from your point of view. Inflammatory writing is part of this blog's currency.
In the pursuit of honesty, I'll submit this: Duncan, you wrote a letter to the editor in which you responded to the rhetorical question, "But why be so immature, crude, and sophomoric?", saying "These are my weapons.". Isn't that essentially the same type of comment you just redacted? My question is, is this a dinner table discussion, or a sermon?
I'm just as much a misanthrope as you, so I'm not complaining. I'll read either one. Cheers.
Post a Comment
<< Home